<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 03:46:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Sex in the City 2&#8242; &#8211; post-feminist male empowerment by artschoolnerd</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/05/sex-in-the-city-2-post-feminist-male-empowerment/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>artschoolnerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 03:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=331#comment-149</guid>
		<description>As someone who could care less about Sex and the City. Toby comes off as, how do I say this, a controlling douche.  I&#039;m insulted that apparently women in general are stupid for enjoying the show (The only two people I know who watch are both fairly conservative, one of whom plans to wait until marriage)  There&#039;s a difference between engaging in a one night stand because you meaningless sex and because your hoping for a relationship to develop. And a man that won&#039;t marry a girl because she has sex with him (or had sex with someone before him) is insecure and hardly worth marrying.  I&#039;m getting tired of this double standard of sexuality, where it&#039;s normal for men to have sex, but abnormal and bad for women to. All this double standard does is perpetrate that the most important thing about being female is what has been between your legs. As a blog promoting &quot;Sense and Sexuality&quot; the last thing you should be doing is upholding that double standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who could care less about Sex and the City. Toby comes off as, how do I say this, a controlling douche.  I&#8217;m insulted that apparently women in general are stupid for enjoying the show (The only two people I know who watch are both fairly conservative, one of whom plans to wait until marriage)  There&#8217;s a difference between engaging in a one night stand because you meaningless sex and because your hoping for a relationship to develop. And a man that won&#8217;t marry a girl because she has sex with him (or had sex with someone before him) is insecure and hardly worth marrying.  I&#8217;m getting tired of this double standard of sexuality, where it&#8217;s normal for men to have sex, but abnormal and bad for women to. All this double standard does is perpetrate that the most important thing about being female is what has been between your legs. As a blog promoting &#8220;Sense and Sexuality&#8221; the last thing you should be doing is upholding that double standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood Sex Symbol: sexy yes, sluttiness no by artschoolnerd</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/05/hollywood-sex-symbol-sexy-yes-sluttiness-no/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>artschoolnerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 01:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=306#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Sexy is how you carry yourself.  It&#039;s confidence.  The skimpiest halter top in the world won&#039;t turn any heads if the girl wearing it cowers or is apprehensive.  When you remember someone sexy, it&#039;s usually not what they wear or look like, it&#039;s what they did and how they did it.

That said, you&#039;re still letting men slide for being sluts.  Every time there&#039;s a morality piece it always comes back to the girls behavior.  I&#039;m tired of hearing all this concern for girls emotional and physical well-being, and no one bothering to think about how much damage is done to teenage boys, or even how much damage the &quot;boys will be boys&quot; attitude does to teenage girls.  More importantly, do we have any hard statistics about how many people actually participate in hook-ups, and more importantly, how frequently.  Most people drink on occasion without getting anywhere near an addicts behavior, should they be treated like an addict because they drink?  I don&#039;t think hook-ups are right for all women, but I don&#039;t think slapping a &quot;Slut&quot; label on women who it works for helps anyone.  I think this whole &quot;hook-up culture&quot; is overblown, the amount of people actually hooking up is probably much smaller then most people think.  You and most other writers of morality pieces seem to me more interested in punishing sluts, for being, well whatever it is you don&#039;t like, since everyone has a different definition for what a slut it.

Basically, if you really wanted to curb &quot;hook-ups&quot; you&#039;d be more interested in empowering women.  Encouraging them to do soul searching, figure out what&#039;s best for them. Not to do it because society presents it as a norm or because some guy wants to. Heck, do the same for boys, soul searching might help some boys figure out that they&#039;d prefer to not try and sleep with everything that moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexy is how you carry yourself.  It&#8217;s confidence.  The skimpiest halter top in the world won&#8217;t turn any heads if the girl wearing it cowers or is apprehensive.  When you remember someone sexy, it&#8217;s usually not what they wear or look like, it&#8217;s what they did and how they did it.</p>
<p>That said, you&#8217;re still letting men slide for being sluts.  Every time there&#8217;s a morality piece it always comes back to the girls behavior.  I&#8217;m tired of hearing all this concern for girls emotional and physical well-being, and no one bothering to think about how much damage is done to teenage boys, or even how much damage the &#8220;boys will be boys&#8221; attitude does to teenage girls.  More importantly, do we have any hard statistics about how many people actually participate in hook-ups, and more importantly, how frequently.  Most people drink on occasion without getting anywhere near an addicts behavior, should they be treated like an addict because they drink?  I don&#8217;t think hook-ups are right for all women, but I don&#8217;t think slapping a &#8220;Slut&#8221; label on women who it works for helps anyone.  I think this whole &#8220;hook-up culture&#8221; is overblown, the amount of people actually hooking up is probably much smaller then most people think.  You and most other writers of morality pieces seem to me more interested in punishing sluts, for being, well whatever it is you don&#8217;t like, since everyone has a different definition for what a slut it.</p>
<p>Basically, if you really wanted to curb &#8220;hook-ups&#8221; you&#8217;d be more interested in empowering women.  Encouraging them to do soul searching, figure out what&#8217;s best for them. Not to do it because society presents it as a norm or because some guy wants to. Heck, do the same for boys, soul searching might help some boys figure out that they&#8217;d prefer to not try and sleep with everything that moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood Sex Symbol: sexy yes, sluttiness no by Mollie</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/05/hollywood-sex-symbol-sexy-yes-sluttiness-no/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=306#comment-145</guid>
		<description>@ artschoolnerd

&quot;You prefer to ignore underlying causes, and direct causes and would rather just blame the sluts.&quot;

I never said men weren&#039;t responsible for their behavior.  They are.  But this is a blog for women, not men.   

The undercurrent of &quot;women as victims&quot; concerns me more.  Put this into a different context.  Assume a girl loves the taste of alcohol, and if she takes one drink, she loses the internal self-restraint to stop pouring the next drink until she is so drunk she passes out.  If this is her regular routine, she has an addiction ... she&#039;s an alcoholic.  

Is it hateful to call her a drunk?  Is she the victim of the local bar or alcohol store, the movies, or parents who somehow failed to tell her not to drink?  Is the solution to close every bar and alcohol production plant in the world to remove all temptation?  I don&#039;t think so.  The problem resides within the individual, and she&#039;s in need of serious medical help.  Identifying/acknowledging the problem is prerequisite to recovery.  

Conversely, should society say that the alcoholic behavior is the new norm, and it’s okay for everyone to emulate the alcoholic&#039;s lifestyle?  Absolutely not!  

I’m sure there are a few girls with a sex addiction who need serious medical help.  But the vast majority of girls/women are not sex addicts.  We have the fully-functioning internal restraint necessary to resist temptation.  If we&#039;ve adopted the sex addict’s behavioral lifestyle, we also have the ability to stop it any time we want.   And most do. 

I think that was Raquel Welch’s point:   the hook-up culture pushes the notion that the sex addict’s behavioral lifestyle is the new societal norm for relations between the sexes.  It’s a lie.  The non-addict simply isn&#039;t physiologically wired that way.  As earlier posts about fairly famous feminists who rejected the hook-up behavior reveal, the emptiness of the lifestyle leaves even the hardiest woman with a defeated self-condemning hangover (and probably a few sexually transmitted diseases she didn’t expect).   

“Besides at no point in your post did you talk about how women can be sexy or what sexy is.”

Great point!    One worth exploring.  How would you define sexy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ artschoolnerd</p>
<p>&#8220;You prefer to ignore underlying causes, and direct causes and would rather just blame the sluts.&#8221;</p>
<p>I never said men weren&#8217;t responsible for their behavior.  They are.  But this is a blog for women, not men.   </p>
<p>The undercurrent of &#8220;women as victims&#8221; concerns me more.  Put this into a different context.  Assume a girl loves the taste of alcohol, and if she takes one drink, she loses the internal self-restraint to stop pouring the next drink until she is so drunk she passes out.  If this is her regular routine, she has an addiction &#8230; she&#8217;s an alcoholic.  </p>
<p>Is it hateful to call her a drunk?  Is she the victim of the local bar or alcohol store, the movies, or parents who somehow failed to tell her not to drink?  Is the solution to close every bar and alcohol production plant in the world to remove all temptation?  I don&#8217;t think so.  The problem resides within the individual, and she&#8217;s in need of serious medical help.  Identifying/acknowledging the problem is prerequisite to recovery.  </p>
<p>Conversely, should society say that the alcoholic behavior is the new norm, and it’s okay for everyone to emulate the alcoholic&#8217;s lifestyle?  Absolutely not!  </p>
<p>I’m sure there are a few girls with a sex addiction who need serious medical help.  But the vast majority of girls/women are not sex addicts.  We have the fully-functioning internal restraint necessary to resist temptation.  If we&#8217;ve adopted the sex addict’s behavioral lifestyle, we also have the ability to stop it any time we want.   And most do. </p>
<p>I think that was Raquel Welch’s point:   the hook-up culture pushes the notion that the sex addict’s behavioral lifestyle is the new societal norm for relations between the sexes.  It’s a lie.  The non-addict simply isn&#8217;t physiologically wired that way.  As earlier posts about fairly famous feminists who rejected the hook-up behavior reveal, the emptiness of the lifestyle leaves even the hardiest woman with a defeated self-condemning hangover (and probably a few sexually transmitted diseases she didn’t expect).   </p>
<p>“Besides at no point in your post did you talk about how women can be sexy or what sexy is.”</p>
<p>Great point!    One worth exploring.  How would you define sexy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood Sex Symbol: sexy yes, sluttiness no by artschoolnerd</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/05/hollywood-sex-symbol-sexy-yes-sluttiness-no/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>artschoolnerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=306#comment-144</guid>
		<description>@ Mollie &quot;The bottom line is that boys need cooperative girls willing to sink to their level to make it happen.&quot;

So, in other words, men are incapable of abstaining from sex.  In your words, men can&#039;t say no to sex. At all. Heck, by what you&#039;ve said, men are incapable of controlling themselves in anyway. But it&#039;s not their fault for being irresponsible, they aren&#039;t being labeled sluts and scorned by society. Conversely, you also say 

&quot;we girls are the masters of our own bodies, and no one forces us to participate in any form of sexual activity?

So we have complete, rational control of our bodies at all times, and men don&#039;t. Wow. My point stands. You prefer to ignore underlying causes, and direct causes and would rather just blame the sluts.  You prefer to ignore that it takes two to tango, and that the guy is just a responsible for slutty behavior as the girl,  but it&#039;s easier to just accept the status quo.  It&#039;s easier to not think and just hatefully call out sluts.  

Besides, at no point in your post did you talk about how women can be sexy or what sexy is. Instead of seemingly taking a position to talk about how to be sexy without being slutty, you completely bypass it to go off about how awful sluts are.  Instead of trying to help, you&#039;re more interested in tearing people down.  You might not be a slut, but that kind of pettiness isn&#039;t sexy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mollie &#8220;The bottom line is that boys need cooperative girls willing to sink to their level to make it happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, in other words, men are incapable of abstaining from sex.  In your words, men can&#8217;t say no to sex. At all. Heck, by what you&#8217;ve said, men are incapable of controlling themselves in anyway. But it&#8217;s not their fault for being irresponsible, they aren&#8217;t being labeled sluts and scorned by society. Conversely, you also say </p>
<p>&#8220;we girls are the masters of our own bodies, and no one forces us to participate in any form of sexual activity?</p>
<p>So we have complete, rational control of our bodies at all times, and men don&#8217;t. Wow. My point stands. You prefer to ignore underlying causes, and direct causes and would rather just blame the sluts.  You prefer to ignore that it takes two to tango, and that the guy is just a responsible for slutty behavior as the girl,  but it&#8217;s easier to just accept the status quo.  It&#8217;s easier to not think and just hatefully call out sluts.  </p>
<p>Besides, at no point in your post did you talk about how women can be sexy or what sexy is. Instead of seemingly taking a position to talk about how to be sexy without being slutty, you completely bypass it to go off about how awful sluts are.  Instead of trying to help, you&#8217;re more interested in tearing people down.  You might not be a slut, but that kind of pettiness isn&#8217;t sexy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood Sex Symbol: sexy yes, sluttiness no by Mollie</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/05/hollywood-sex-symbol-sexy-yes-sluttiness-no/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=306#comment-143</guid>
		<description>@ artschoolnerd - &quot;you just go and make it all the girls fault.&quot;

Yes, I think so.  Except in rape or child abuse cases, we girls are the masters of our own bodies, and no one forces us to participate in any form of sexual activity.  (Force is what makes rape so heinous.)   

We can hardly play the &quot;victim,&quot; either  ... of society, Hollywood, poor parenting, peer pressure, and certainly not men ... if we choose to engage sexually.  If a girl&#039;s a slut, she has no one to blame but herself.  (Maybe &#039;slut&#039; is like porn:  we may not be able to define it easily, but we know it when we see it.)

Lots of people question why teenage boys won&#039;t control themselves in sex or anything else.  Car insurance companies have done plenty of research on why boys are more reckless (irresponsible) than girls behind the wheel.  But they are.  The bottom line is that boys need cooperative girls willing to sink to their level to make it happen.  

So the choice is the girl&#039;s, and responsibility/blame goes with that choice.  The good part is that any girl can change her behavior any time she wants.  Life offers lots of second changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ artschoolnerd &#8211; &#8220;you just go and make it all the girls fault.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, I think so.  Except in rape or child abuse cases, we girls are the masters of our own bodies, and no one forces us to participate in any form of sexual activity.  (Force is what makes rape so heinous.)   </p>
<p>We can hardly play the &#8220;victim,&#8221; either  &#8230; of society, Hollywood, poor parenting, peer pressure, and certainly not men &#8230; if we choose to engage sexually.  If a girl&#8217;s a slut, she has no one to blame but herself.  (Maybe &#8217;slut&#8217; is like porn:  we may not be able to define it easily, but we know it when we see it.)</p>
<p>Lots of people question why teenage boys won&#8217;t control themselves in sex or anything else.  Car insurance companies have done plenty of research on why boys are more reckless (irresponsible) than girls behind the wheel.  But they are.  The bottom line is that boys need cooperative girls willing to sink to their level to make it happen.  </p>
<p>So the choice is the girl&#8217;s, and responsibility/blame goes with that choice.  The good part is that any girl can change her behavior any time she wants.  Life offers lots of second changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood Sex Symbol: sexy yes, sluttiness no by sweetpea</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/05/hollywood-sex-symbol-sexy-yes-sluttiness-no/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>sweetpea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=306#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I think Ms. Welch and the blog writer have a good point. There is an enormous difference between being sexy and being slutty and many young women and girls miss the mark on this completely. You can be incredibly sexy and not show an ounce of skin! Bet young women today haven&#039;t considered that! More women like Welch should speak out about this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ms. Welch and the blog writer have a good point. There is an enormous difference between being sexy and being slutty and many young women and girls miss the mark on this completely. You can be incredibly sexy and not show an ounce of skin! Bet young women today haven&#8217;t considered that! More women like Welch should speak out about this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood Sex Symbol: sexy yes, sluttiness no by artschoolnerd</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/05/hollywood-sex-symbol-sexy-yes-sluttiness-no/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>artschoolnerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=306#comment-141</guid>
		<description>&quot;In reality, any sane person has to feel sorry for these pathetic girls, because sluttiness is never attractive to either gender.?

Thanks.  Really, thanks.  Instead of thoughtfully trying to look at how society and media have pushed forward oral sex as consequence free, instead of questioning why the mother in article wasn&#039;t already talking to her daughter about sex, instead of wondering why american parents in general are so afraid to talk about sex and it&#039;s consequences, and instead of wondering how teenage boys are damaged by this as well, you just go and make it all the girls fault. No one likes a slut.  Let&#039;s not worry about how damaging those messages are either.  Let&#039;s just keep in mind that a 13 year old girl who particaptes in oral sex (I&#039;m not even touching the statutory rape laws and the fact that she&#039;s under the age of consent and thus legally can not give consent and am both hoping and assuming her partners are also underage) is a slut, just cause.  Never mind that it&#039;s probably perceived as completely normal to her, and that no ones probably told her otherwise.  
And thanks both to you and Raquel Welch for enforcing that sex is always dependent on the girl, and thus this &quot;sex epidemic&quot; is to blame on females, more specifically sluts.  Cause a guy could never make a decision to not have sex, no matter his belief system, feelings or anything else can keep a teenage boy from sex.  God forbid we ask guys to not sleep around as much.  They just can&#039;t control themselves and thats why we have to count on girls, who are subject to the same raging hormones at that time of life, to keep them in line.   If the girls fail, they&#039;re sluts.  Is the guy a slut though? No, it&#039;s normal for him to want sex, so society and people like you instead blame the girl, the slut, how dare that brazen hussy do it.  
Do we address how malicious the word slut can be, do we discuss how one person&#039;s definition of slut and a group of bully&#039;s drove Phoebe Prince to suicide?  Do we address the culture that demands girls be somewhat sexual, less they be called frigid and prudish, but they can&#039;t be TOO sexual, cause then they&#039;re a slut, and no one will ever love them ever if they&#039;re a slut.  Do we question why we don&#039;t expect teenage boys to control themselves, to keep it in their pants, to honor their commitments.  No, that would require thinking.  It&#039;s just so much easier to call some girls sluts then to actually try and make a difference.  It&#039;s so much easier to say &quot;something&#039;s wrong here!&quot; then to actually address the real problem.  As humans aren&#039;t we capable of so much better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In reality, any sane person has to feel sorry for these pathetic girls, because sluttiness is never attractive to either gender.?</p>
<p>Thanks.  Really, thanks.  Instead of thoughtfully trying to look at how society and media have pushed forward oral sex as consequence free, instead of questioning why the mother in article wasn&#8217;t already talking to her daughter about sex, instead of wondering why american parents in general are so afraid to talk about sex and it&#8217;s consequences, and instead of wondering how teenage boys are damaged by this as well, you just go and make it all the girls fault. No one likes a slut.  Let&#8217;s not worry about how damaging those messages are either.  Let&#8217;s just keep in mind that a 13 year old girl who particaptes in oral sex (I&#8217;m not even touching the statutory rape laws and the fact that she&#8217;s under the age of consent and thus legally can not give consent and am both hoping and assuming her partners are also underage) is a slut, just cause.  Never mind that it&#8217;s probably perceived as completely normal to her, and that no ones probably told her otherwise.<br />
And thanks both to you and Raquel Welch for enforcing that sex is always dependent on the girl, and thus this &#8220;sex epidemic&#8221; is to blame on females, more specifically sluts.  Cause a guy could never make a decision to not have sex, no matter his belief system, feelings or anything else can keep a teenage boy from sex.  God forbid we ask guys to not sleep around as much.  They just can&#8217;t control themselves and thats why we have to count on girls, who are subject to the same raging hormones at that time of life, to keep them in line.   If the girls fail, they&#8217;re sluts.  Is the guy a slut though? No, it&#8217;s normal for him to want sex, so society and people like you instead blame the girl, the slut, how dare that brazen hussy do it.<br />
Do we address how malicious the word slut can be, do we discuss how one person&#8217;s definition of slut and a group of bully&#8217;s drove Phoebe Prince to suicide?  Do we address the culture that demands girls be somewhat sexual, less they be called frigid and prudish, but they can&#8217;t be TOO sexual, cause then they&#8217;re a slut, and no one will ever love them ever if they&#8217;re a slut.  Do we question why we don&#8217;t expect teenage boys to control themselves, to keep it in their pants, to honor their commitments.  No, that would require thinking.  It&#8217;s just so much easier to call some girls sluts then to actually try and make a difference.  It&#8217;s so much easier to say &#8220;something&#8217;s wrong here!&#8221; then to actually address the real problem.  As humans aren&#8217;t we capable of so much better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Hook-Up Fatigue Setting In? by artschoolnerd</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/04/is-hook-up-fatigue-setting-in/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>artschoolnerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=301#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this how societies and cultures go though? I mean, you have a period of social change/rebelliousness followed by a more conservative period?  The Victorian Era came before the Roaring Twenties, then the depression hit and WWII then the fifties.  Of course, with the advent of the media age, subcultures emerge and things drag out a little longer because of more exposure.  So instead of there being one dominate culture, there&#039;s many subcultures vying for attention.  For the last decade or so promiscuity was popular and considered normal, now all the cool kids want to be different from the nerds and being abstinent or celibate is cool.  Or something like that.
 I wish we could get rid of the double standard though.  A one night stand improves a man&#039;s standing but damages a womans? Lame. Beyond that, i feel like one night stands would be less damaging if people bothered to negotiate/actually talk about expectations.  Sadly, my generation kinda sucks as far as maturity in sex goes.  Most don&#039;t feel the need to wear condoms for oral, and most have gross misunderstandings about sex and disease in general.  A glance at Texts from Last Night would show that. (No boys, the vagina doesn&#039;t get loose because a girl sleeps around. If a person is too drunk to drive then they are probably too drunk to have sex with and then yes, it&#039;s rape. Yes girls, you can get STI&#039;s from oral, put a condom on it first, use a dental dam) 
I don&#039;t have one night stands, they aren&#039;t for me. I don&#039;t really care if other people have them, as long as they&#039;re being safe and know themselves well enough emotionally to be able to handle them.  If hook-up culture were to die, the media might have to pay attention to something important rather then scaring parents and over-concerned do-gooders with the sordid details of their teen or young adults hypothetical sex life.  Maybe as a society we could move on from sex being notches on a guys belt/bed post and as a reason to devalue women.  The kids are alright.

(Also, Lady Gaga is full of Awesome.  Free condoms are provided at her concerts for anyone who wants them.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this how societies and cultures go though? I mean, you have a period of social change/rebelliousness followed by a more conservative period?  The Victorian Era came before the Roaring Twenties, then the depression hit and WWII then the fifties.  Of course, with the advent of the media age, subcultures emerge and things drag out a little longer because of more exposure.  So instead of there being one dominate culture, there&#8217;s many subcultures vying for attention.  For the last decade or so promiscuity was popular and considered normal, now all the cool kids want to be different from the nerds and being abstinent or celibate is cool.  Or something like that.<br />
 I wish we could get rid of the double standard though.  A one night stand improves a man&#8217;s standing but damages a womans? Lame. Beyond that, i feel like one night stands would be less damaging if people bothered to negotiate/actually talk about expectations.  Sadly, my generation kinda sucks as far as maturity in sex goes.  Most don&#8217;t feel the need to wear condoms for oral, and most have gross misunderstandings about sex and disease in general.  A glance at Texts from Last Night would show that. (No boys, the vagina doesn&#8217;t get loose because a girl sleeps around. If a person is too drunk to drive then they are probably too drunk to have sex with and then yes, it&#8217;s rape. Yes girls, you can get STI&#8217;s from oral, put a condom on it first, use a dental dam)<br />
I don&#8217;t have one night stands, they aren&#8217;t for me. I don&#8217;t really care if other people have them, as long as they&#8217;re being safe and know themselves well enough emotionally to be able to handle them.  If hook-up culture were to die, the media might have to pay attention to something important rather then scaring parents and over-concerned do-gooders with the sordid details of their teen or young adults hypothetical sex life.  Maybe as a society we could move on from sex being notches on a guys belt/bed post and as a reason to devalue women.  The kids are alright.</p>
<p>(Also, Lady Gaga is full of Awesome.  Free condoms are provided at her concerts for anyone who wants them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A little good news for abstinence-only sex ed by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/02/a-little-good-news-for-abstinence-only-sex-ed/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=263#comment-138</guid>
		<description>The site&#039;s informational pages, specifically the FACTS pages, are based on pure science compiled by a physician.  In contrast (and as with most &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;blogs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;), the Sense and Sexuality blog is pure commentary (opinion), news and discussion related to the broader topic of sexuality in our culture and time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site&#8217;s informational pages, specifically the FACTS pages, are based on pure science compiled by a physician.  In contrast (and as with most <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog rel="nofollow"><b>blogs</b></a>), the Sense and Sexuality blog is pure commentary (opinion), news and discussion related to the broader topic of sexuality in our culture and time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A little good news for abstinence-only sex ed by eti</title>
		<link>http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/2010/02/a-little-good-news-for-abstinence-only-sex-ed/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>eti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cblpi.org/senseandsexualityblog/?p=263#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I like this site but there is something I don&#039;t get. It says on the homepage, &quot;It is pure medical science - about you and your body - compiled by a physician&quot;, but I haven&#039;t seen anything here written by a physician. And many of the blog entries are opinions about cultural issues, not science at all. Could someone please explain that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this site but there is something I don&#8217;t get. It says on the homepage, &#8220;It is pure medical science &#8211; about you and your body &#8211; compiled by a physician&#8221;, but I haven&#8217;t seen anything here written by a physician. And many of the blog entries are opinions about cultural issues, not science at all. Could someone please explain that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
