Archive for the ‘Abstinence’ Category

Is Hook-Up Fatigue Setting In?

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

It looks that way.  Stephanie Chen’s CNN article, No Hooking Up, No Sex for Some Co-eds, reports students are choosing to disengage from the often alcohol-fueled hook-up scene that leaves many women with a hangover of the blues even if they manage to avoid getting a sexually transmitted disease. 

It shouldn’t come as a surprise.  While some researchers have found no long-term harmful psychological damage from hooking-up, other studies, writes Chen, “have shown the instability from hooking up can cause depression.  Repeated rejection and detached relationships can also damage self-esteem.”  Even researchers who discount psychological damage warn that the hook-up culture has become a “direct route for spreading STDs,” since those who practice this type of sex tend to engage with many more partners.  

A growing body of evidence suggests women and men have very different morning-after reactions to friends-with-benefits, hooking up, and similar nonromantic sexual relations.

(more…)

A little good news for abstinence-only sex ed

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

“Abstinence-only sex education doesn’t work” has been repeated so often that it’s become holy writ.  Now comes a little good news for the much maligned program. 

A two-year National Institute of Mental Health-funded “randomized trial of several interventions, including abstinence-only” showed  “a “statistically significant benefit” for the abstinence approach:   it was more effective in delaying sexual initiation.

John Gever, senior editor of MedpageToday, summarizes:

(more…)

CDC Panel Games the Data on Abstinence Programs

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Much was made a couple of months ago when the Centers for Disease Control released a report on the effectiveness of various sex education programs (“Meta-analysis of Group Based Interventions to Prevent Adolescent Pregnancy, HIV and other STIs”). 

“Abstinence-only Sex Ed Rejected by Expert Panel,” announced one pop-medical site headline, writing “there’s no evidence that abstinence-only sexual education programs cut teens’ risk…”   In a see-I-told-you-so tone, the article added that the CDC Task Force report recommended “group-based comprehensive risk reduction (CRR) programs that focus on condoms and delaying sexual initiation.”

Unfortunately the article’s headline and conclusion – indeed the CDC’s report itself – are erroneous and misleading in light of a Minority Report published on November 7 by members of the Task Force.   It looks like the CDC gamed the data to get the result it wanted.  Worse, the CDC is apparently refusing to release the quantitative data for public scrutiny.

(more…)

Sex ed leaves much to be desired

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

The University of Alabama Kaleidoscope published an interesting point/counterpoint yesterday on the subject of sex education generally — and abstinence specifically – here.  

(more…)